Home About Issues Schnaubelt Stepner Darragh Links Other Articles Contact
 
                  
                     Fred Schnaubelt
           
                                                                    Part 4 of 4
           
    Planned Chaos: San Diego County's New General Plan
                                      
 

 Printed in San Diego Daily Transcript Sept. 13, 2010

 


In developing a General Plan for the county things have gotten so complicated, it's impossible not only for planning commissioners to know it all, but also community planning groups, the planning department and even the Board of Supervisors.

The evidence: San Diego home prices, less than the U.S median price in 1973, are now more than double the national median, $389,440 vs. $179,600 (CAR 8/25/10) with reported overcrowding in more than 50,000 dwelling units countywide. So much for 37 years of government planning!

In the former USSR with 70 years of housing shortages, they had a saying: "You can have planning or housing -- but not both." The county has been planning its yet-to-be-adopted General Plan 2020 Update since 1998.

The County Planning Department imagines it can make an enormously complex General Plan for 491,800 present and future residents -- despite having a department of planners unable to make something as simple as a 10-cent lead pencil. I've argued previously that no planner knows how to extrude graphite lead, create a factice eraser, or smelt a brass ferule. And yet they want to dictate where and how thousands of people should live. Think about it!

Some people prefer to live in 27-story high-rise condos, such as the Meridian downtown, others in rural areas if allowed, some choose two-story apartments buildings, while most prefer single-family detached homes. Additionally there are those who prefer mobile homes and nomads who wish to live in travel trailers. For whom is the professional, government planner to plan?

Can the San Diego County Planning Department with any degree of certainty foretell how many people will marry in 2015 requiring additional housing; or how many will divorce requiring two dwelling units in place of one? How many children will become teenagers requiring separate bedrooms for sons and daughters possibly requiring a new or larger home? How many elderly people will suffer the death of a spouse, motivating the survivor to move into a smaller home or apartment? And what will be the family makeup of newcomers to the region? How many households will double up? SANDAG reported between the 1990 and 2000 Census the number doubling up was equivalent to four Poway size cities -- completely unforeseen by government planners.

The Draft General Plan Update stipulates: "The General Plan for the unincorporated County has not been comprehensively updated since 1979 and has been the subject of substantial modification over the past 30 years. During this period, considerable growth and change has taken place, leading to the incorporation of a number of cities and annexation of lands on the periphery of the unincorporated area. Numerous new laws and regulations that relate specifically to General Plans or more generally to development and natural resources have also been enacted." (County DPLU Draft EIR pg. 1.7 4/2/10)

Government omnipotence versus freedom: There would be no difficulty about efficiently planning a community were conditions so simple that a single person or discrete group of planners, commissioners and supervisors could effectively survey all the relevant facts. However, when the factors that must be considered to render a rational decision become so numerous that it's impossible to gain an overall view, government planning can, and does lead to "planned chaos." San Diego's 37-year trend of shortages and above average home prices irrefutably demonstrates the failure of government omnipotence. "You can have planning or housing, not both." This doesn't mean no mistakes are made in the private sector, but rather they will be fewer, less severe and tend to be self-correcting.

Compared with the free market's virtue of using everybody's decision-making capacity and using specialized local knowledge, as noted by Nobel Laureate F.A. Hayek, "government planning is incredibly clumsy, primitive and limited in scope." The enormous dispersed decision-making capacity of the free market -- land developers, builders, appraisers, landscapers, mortgage lenders, prospective buyers, sellers and tenants -- thousands of people working individually, but in harmony, can address and resolve far more problems than the combined efforts of any planning department, planning commission, community group and Board of Supervisors.

The hallmark of a market economy is the price system. The cost of raw materials and the prices obtained from retail consumers answer all the questions posed above. Prices and profits tell builders immediately if there's a shortage or surplus of apartments, condominiums, single-family homes of two, three or four bedrooms, or mobile homes -- a shortage or surplus of labor, materials, financing or appropriately zoned land to meet the most urgent needs of consumers.

Incredibly, price isn't even mentioned in the county's General Plan or planning department manuals, maps or publications as a guiding principle. Incredible because our national $14.5 trillion economy is inescapably predicated on prices and profits which determine what's to be produced and in what quantity and quality. Thirty-seven years of government planning has resulted in San Diego's home prices consistently 80 percent to 100 percent higher than the national average. The General Plan Update must be junked and private property rights restored. Government inexorably raises the cost of building housing while developers in the free market ineluctably must find ways to build better at lower costs.

Blame for the current deplorable situation rests with both the County Board of Supervisors and planning department in their trickle-down efforts to redistribute wealth. They thwart privately built housing while redistributing hundreds of millions of dollars from rural landowners to urban property owners.

If planners would envision themselves as facilitators and coordinators, as well as insuring that developers fund or install essential public improvements in exchange for public services, they would be fulfilling their responsibility to the public. Their proper role should be more likened to putting up signposts on our highways, rather than telling everyone "My way or the highway!"

And when new planners join the county, they should be told when they can make a simple, ordinary wood pencil, they may then be qualified to plan an extremely more complicated community. To date, only the free market utilizing everyone's knowledge can make a pencil, or an affordable, livable, beautiful countryside.


Schnaubelt, president of Citizens for Private Property Rights, has been a commercial real estate broker for 39 years and was a San Diego City Councilman from 1977-81.


                                                                               San Diego CA               Copyright © 2003-2011  San Diego Issues, Inc.tm - All rights reserved
                                  
                                                 619.224-8584                                               E-mail        Webmaster              Disclaime
r