Home About Issues Articles Images Links Contact

 
  
 Fred Schnaubelt

           
 
             
                      A Lesson in Free Enterprise

 

 

 
Published in the San Diego Daily Transcript May 4, 2009

 

"Government is the great fiction through which everyone endeavors to live at the expense of everyone else."

                                                                                                                              ------- Frederic Bastiat, The Law

Only 53 percent of Americans believe capitalism is better than socialism, according to an April Rasmussen poll, down from 70 percent in 2008.

Undoubtedly, the decline in capitalism's esteem is due to the massive bailouts of major banks and corporations and excessive salaries for their officers. There also is a gross misunderstanding of who benefits from capitalism. Few people seem aware that most "big" businessmen do not believe in capitalism, the economic system of limited government, private property, and free enterprise with both profits and losses, and never have.

Adam Smith acknowledged this critical point in 1776 in the Wealth of Nations when he wrote that all proposals from businessmen should be viewed "... but with the most suspicious attention." And that "people of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices."

Highly intelligent A type personalities with strong wills, aggressive resourcefulness and obsessive enterprise (businessmen) tend to succeed under any system of social organization whether political, caste, religious or economic. They can run huge corporations privately or for any government. But only under capitalism can the strong succeed by serving the weaker -- and as the weaker wish to be served.

Capitalists are instrumental in making free enterprise work but they are merely the helmsmen that steer a ship, writes Ludwig von Mises in Human Action. None are free to direct the course, each is merely a steersman. Each must unconditionally obey the captain's orders. The captain is the consumer. Consumers, through their buying or abstention from buying, decide what should be produced in what quantity and quality. Consumers make poor people rich (Bill Gates, J.K. Rowling, Sam Walton, Oprah Winfrey, Ross Perot) and rich people/corporations poor (GM, Chrysler, Mervyns, Circuit City, Bombay, Sharper Image). http://mises.org/Books/humanaction.pdf

Capitalism is production for the masses, for you and me, not for royalty, politicians or an aristocracy. Silk stockings were made for an aristocracy -- the mass production of nylons was for shop girls. Once you had to be wealthy to own a clock (when they cost as much as a cottage), now anyone can afford a Timex. Capitalism, Mises notes, "is an economic democracy in which every penny gives a right to vote. Consumers are the sovereign people." It is the only system that allows for the allocation of resources based on what consumers want everyday and are willing to pay for, and not dependent upon the guesswork of bureaucrats and politicians.

Scribbled on a gas station restroom wall: "Everyone has an idea for making a million dollars (that won't work)." Under free enterprise capitalism you must "persuade" people to voluntarily buy your ideas, products, services. However, when a politician has a million-dollar idea he or she can use the power of government to "force" others to support it. Government, as economist Murray Rothbard has pointed out, "is the only organization in society that obtains its revenue not by voluntary contribution or payment for services but by coercion."

We're hearing a lot today about greed (covetousness). It's always been with us -- it's not new with the current banking meltdown and bailouts. Greed is not confined to business. Really, can you imagine ever a class of people greedier than politicians who want to tax everything that moves and everything that stands still?

Why do so many people loathe capitalism? Mises contends that under other economic systems, wealth is not a market phenomenon but obtained by conquest, extortion or government favoritism. Capitalists, however, owe their wealth to people who voluntarily support their vocations. People tend to overestimate their own worth but know under capitalism their worth is determined by what they contribute to satisfying the desires of consumers -- in the opinion of consumers. Consumers determine what each of us gets paid by what they are willing to pay for our services. There is no one else to blame for our economic shortcomings.

Two of the "Seven Deadly Sins," envy and covetousness offer another clue. Those reporters, lawyers, intellectuals who resent capitalism do because their former classmates are more successful. University professors after years of study earning degrees resent capitalism because they know of people like an "uneducated" friend who dropped out of high school, became a contractor serving consumers and created a $14 million estate before dying prematurely.

Movie stars resent capitalism after they become rich and famous. Because the public gets bored easily and constantly needs amusement they know they will be history after one flop, a constant source of anxiety. How utterly unfair. They resent a fickle audience that rewards a Madonna every time she re-invents herself (with $242 million in 2008) when they believe they sing better. Whereas in socialist countries the arts and sciences get preferential treatment and participants are continuously honored and elevated to the highest levels of society.

Hopefully, more Americans will learn that they as consumers are first and foremost the primary beneficiaries of capitalism and the cornucopia it provides us through the businessmen who simply steer the ship. While it's government's responsibility to create a fair field without favor, government should not be a referee that makes up rules as it goes along while also becoming a player in the game.

We all must fight for the things in which we believe. It's not enough simply to be against socialism. We must endorse free enterprise and explain it as best we can. History has proven that governments consume wealth and only capitalism can create wealth -- for us and our children.


Schnaubelt, president of Citizens for Private Property Rights, has been a commercial real estate broker for 39 years and was a San Diego City Councilman from 1977-81.


                                                                  San Diego CA                  Copyright © 2003-2010   San Diego Issues, Inc.tm - All rights reserved
                                                                
 619.224-8584                                        E-mail      Webmaster             
Disclaimer