Home About Issues Schnaubelt Stepner Darragh Links Other Articles Contact
 
              
                 Fred Schnaubelt

                      
SHOULD LANDLORDS BE
                    BURNED AT THE STAKE?

                                                         
           

                  
 
September 17, 2002 
PUBLISHED IN SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT SEPTEMBER 23, 2002
   

Donna Frye seems to believe that landlords are witches and should be burned at the stake.

Councilwoman Frye honestly thinks rents in San Diego are too high. She also believes property owners should be required to give a reason when asking someone to vacate an apartment when their tenancy ends and claims too many people are getting evicted for "no reason" at all.

My first week in real estate, I was admonished, "Fred, nothing is more dangerous than an honest but ignorant salesman.  You can be persuasive because you speak with conviction. You can be dangerous because honesty is no substitute for knowledge." Honest, ill-informed politicians are even more dangerous because they control the coercive reins government (their awesome power can be used for good or bad).   

An article in the Harvard Business Review titled Freedom, Authority and Decentralization suggests that, "The chief characteristic of  'any group in our society is not knowledge but ignorance.' Consider that any one person can know only a fraction of what is going on around him. Much of what that person knows or believes will be false rather than true. And, at any given time, vastly more is not known than is known -- It seems possible, then, that in organizing ourselves into a hierarchy of authority, we may really be institutionalizing ignorance."

Pulitzer Prize author Barbara Tuchman says one reason government has such a poorer performance record than that of almost any other human activity is, "Schedules are broken down into15 minutes appointments ...policy makers never have time to think. This leaves a rather important vacuum."  Petitioners may spend fifteen months analyzing and developing  a project, go before the city council and be dispatched in  15-minutes. Can informed opinions be derived from a 15-minute presentation? Can elected officials  render wise decisions after even hearing 15-minutes In Favor and 15-minutes Against an issue?

Those of us who believe that the Constitution's guarantee of life, liberty, and property are inalienable rights and that to take these rights away, even by majority vote, is morally wrong -- have a duty to stand up and prove we are not witches.

First and foremost, without apartment owners, tenants would have four choices, live with their parents as is the case in nearly all other countries, live with friends or strangers (look at the want ads for roommates), buy a home with twice the monthly payments of an apartment, or wait forever to get the 5% of housing that's provided by government. Builders and rental owners have made this the best-housed country (greatest square footage per capita) in the world.

Are rents unreasonable? Compared to what? In 1986 the average apartment unit in San Diego sold for $48,303 or 8.1 times its monthly income. In 2001 the average apartment sold for $69,400 or 8 times its monthly income. If rents had kept up with other items in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) the average price should have risen to $78,050 per apartment unit, 12% more than today's selling prices. Clearly, rents have not kept pace with other items in the CPI and last year rents were 12% lower, on average, than what would have been justified had apartment owners kept up with inflation over the past 15 year.  Compared to the 37% increase in the San Diego City Council's office budget over the past two years, rents are substantially lower!

                    SEE GRAPH

Suffice to say, apartment owners are in the business to make money. Whenever an apartment is vacant they're not making money. They'll do just about anything to keep good tenants, including taking them to the grocery store, baking cookies, and babysitting. Contrary to the opinions of Councilwoman Frye, landlords do not evict tenants lightly.

Many landlords prefer one-year leases. Tenants balk at one-year leases; they want the freedom to leave on a moment's notice. Absent a lease, the most common reasons for giving 30-day notices are: complaints by neighbors, suspicion of drug use, loud playing of music or televisions that can be heard a block away ("my neighbors enjoy my music," one tenant said), keeping neighbors awake with loud parties and domestic squabbles.

Complaining neighbors insist on anonymity. Anonymity tends to reduce fist fights. Give a reason for evicting a tenant and you invite a lawsuit. Unruly tenants, of course, always deny causing trouble. Landlords sometimes must act as the neighborhood cop and the 30-day notice is their only weapon. The 30-day notice is the most effective way to keep the peace and the only way to keep unruly tenants in line. Since not every one chooses to abide by the rules should the majority of responsible renters suffer because of the acts of a few miscreants?

Evicting for cause is an altogether different thing but can still be a touchy situation for property owners cognizant of lawsuit abuse. Things that discourage people from investing in rentals are: Tenants who change their motorcycle oil or re-build car engines on the living room carpet, saw the dining room table in half while making a book case, punch out the drywall between apartments so others won't see them visiting the lady or gentleman next door, kick an air-conditioner completely out of the wall when it stops working, not emptying the trash or garbage for weeks or months which surprise, surprise is where all the cockroaches and rats come from (gee, you mean it's not the owners who put them there?), let cats urinate in a particular corner, and not ever clean up dog doo-doo (tiny doggy doo).

It's also disconcerting when tenants store black powder and live ammunition in bedrooms, shoot holes through the roof, throw managers into the pool for not allowing prostitutes to visit, let a 15 year-old back a car through the kitchen wall, let children swing on kitchen cabinets and draperies until they fall, grow marijuana in closets under grow lamps, let bathtubs overflow repeatedly, have leaking waterbeds, dye the carpet multiple colors, heat gasoline on the kitchen stove to better clean one's clothes (yes, there was a fire), have water fights in your apartment with garden hoses (these two elderly women may have been drinking), stamp on smelly acacia beans when vacating an apartment, put cement down the drains and toilets, jam locks so they can't be opened, and at three different properties shoot off the locks when locked out by wives or girlfriends (some guys just can't understand why they would be locked out).

Instead of treating apartment owners as witches, I call on Councilwoman Donna Frye to introduce a resolution declaring an
APARTMENT AND RENTAL OWNERS DAY IN SAN DIEGO.   This in recognition of the phenomenal job they've done, according to the U.S. Census, in providing 95% of the affordable housing in San Diego.  Apartment owners should be commended for keeping rent increases below the rate of inflation for the past 16 years.

Permission granted to forward to others and quote with or without credit
Fred Schnaubelt
 


                                                                                   San Diego CA                  Copyright © 2003-2011   San Diego Issues, Inc.tm - All rights reserved
                                                                        
          619.224-8584                                        E-mail      Webmaster             
Disclaimer