Home About Issues Articles Images Links Contact

 
                                
Fred Schnaubelt

           
 
         The Lady or the Tiger--Inflation or Deflation?

 

 

                                                                 Part 1
 

 


“The Lady or The Tiger,”
Frank Stockton’s famous short story tells of a semi-barbaric king who administered justice by throwing those arrested into an Arena with a beautiful lady behind one door and a starving tiger behind the other.  The person charged was free to choose either door and his choice, critical to say the least, would determine guilt or innocence. Today all of us are also are faced with a critical choice. With the “Greatest Deleveraging” in history do we prepare for Inflation or Deflation?  Which choice -- will determine our financial outcome!

What do you imagine is happening?  The Obama Administration is doubling the number of dollars in the world as shown in the nearby chart.  Do you imagine as these dollars are injected into the economy there will be a doubling of the number of homes, apartments, office buildings, automobiles, doctors, hospitals, health care, farms, shoes, commodities, etc?  Or will there simply be more dollars chasing too few goods and services?  Who gets the money first while it has the most buying power?  Will it be government employees? And who pays?  Democratic Vice President John Calhoun, under Andrew Jackson, observed that (regardless of tax forms filed) while lobbying to raise taxes, government agents and employees pay no taxes.*

With the government seemingly resorting to “printing” dollars (inflation) will the result be increasing prices/yields of CDs, T-Bills, or oil, gold and silver, or a stock market bubble, or real estate bubble?  Paradoxically, we are seeing deflation big time in home prices down 35% to 50% in some areas, and oil down from $147 per barrel to less than $63 per barrel. Where is a safe harbor? We all want to survive this massive worldwide “credit contraction” and plan accordingly.  If simply printing dollars, electronically or otherwise, is the solution to recessions then Zimbabwe where everyone is a multi-millionaire after 11,000% inflation would lead the world.  Zimbabwe's Federal Reserve Bank apparently took to heart John Maynard Keynes contention that the more money the government prints the richer everyone will be.  An economy, however, can only grow when there is an increase in the production of goods and services. Simply increasing or redistributing dollars (Stimulus Plans) won’t do the trick, as Zimbabweans can attest. The dumbest among us however, still believe you can give tax cuts for 95% of the people to be paid by the richest 5% without catastrophic consequences.

Every dollar the government taxes or borrows to stimulate the economy is a dollar that can’t be spent by the private sector. It’s a wash -- no net benefit.  Not only will the Stimulus not work – it can’t work!  Government stimulus spending can only help prolong depressions as FDR proved.  A third alternative, re-inflating real estate will lead ultimately to a bigger, longer depression. Depressions/recessions painful as they may be are necessary to liquidate the easy money malinvestments made during the preceding boom in order to restore equilibrium between supply and demand. While depressions make the whole community poorer, some are enriched. (Falling real estate prices are a Godsend to buyers). The Whiz Kids in the U.S. Treasury Department and White House however, tell us that not only are they smart enough to run auto companies, banks and insurance companies but for every dollar the government spends they still contend there is a Keynesian multiplier effect and each is really worth more than a dollar ($1.50 - $3.00 depending on economic advisor). They alone are the keystone to recovery. So what are the $1.8 trillion below worth?  (The Lady or The Tiger - Inflation or Deflation?  Part 1)

Fred Schnaubelt

*John C. Calhoun: “The two — disbursement and taxation — constitute the fiscal action of the government.  The necessary result is to divide the community into two great classes; one consisting of those who, in reality, pay the taxes, and, of course, bear exclusively the burden of supporting the government; and the other, of those who are the recipients of their proceeds, through disbursements, and who are, in fact, supported by the government; or, in fewer words, to divide [the country] into taxpayers and tax-consumers.” If the “in reality” taxpayers pay the salaries of public employees it is “incontestable” they also pay the public employees’ taxes.

         

 


                    Schnaubelt, president of Citizens for Private Property Rights, has been a commercial real estate broker
                                              for 39 years and was a San Diego City Councilman from 1977-81.


                                                                             San Diego CA                  Copyright © 2003-2010  San Diego Issues, Inc.tm - All rights reserved
                                                                          
  619.224-8584                                        E-mail      Webmaster             
Disclaimer